Re: Re: Re: Re: Clinton: To Build Or Not To Build A Wall
by Anonymous
" first, let me start correcting you about me: i don't support hillary, i've said it many times. i hate the fact that i have to cast a vote in her favor in november." Show us your posts in any other forum where you condemn Hillary. "now, on to north korea. um, no, that's your fearful leader's fault. funny how they only really started to put effort into those nukes once dubya came on board, isn't it? under clinton, they kept their weaponry standard. " You're a liar. "In a February 2003 interview, Albright boasted to NBC, "When we had the Agreed Framework, we did freeze those fuel rods, and had we not, in the last years, we would have somewhere, people calculate, 50 to 100 nuclear weapons." A 1999 congressional study determined that Pyongyang was cheating on the agreement, but Albright disregarded the warning and continued to claim that the Agreed Framework was a success. " http://tinyurl.com/najrg heck, they even gave dubya a chance for a non-nuclear north korea in september of last year... May 25-28, 1999: Former Defense Secretary William Perry visits North Korea and delivers a U.S. disarmament proposal. Sept. 13: North Korea pledges to freeze long-range missile tests. Sept. 17: U.S. President Bill Clinton eases economic sanctions against North Korea. December: A U.S.-led consortium signs a US$4.6 billion contract for two safer, Western-developed light-water nuclear reactors in North Korea. July 2000: North Korea again threatens to restart its nuclear program if Washington doesn't compensate for the loss of electricity caused by delays in building nuclear power plants. http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/east/08/20/nkorea.timeline.nuclear/ ".... when they signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. a couple of days later, against the advice of everyone who knows better, dubya forced the treasury department to impose absurd sactions on them in an attempt to drive out il. didn't work, did it? only made them madder, didn't it? funny how they didn't get madder and madder under clinton, only bush. wonder why that is? BECAUSE CLINTON WAS GIVING THEM NUKE CAPABILITY, YOU MORON. I guess you think Chamberlain was right not to "ANNOY HITLER" . Liberal pinheads like you ALWAYS CAUSE MORE DEATH AND DESTRUCTION WITH YOUR APPEASEMENT. "perhaps it's becase people don't like having unstable neighbors like the 'pubs are turning us in to. we used to be the voice of reason in a sea of insanity, now we're just like all of the other extremist nations in the world. it's time it stopped." it's time you are stopped. Only an intellectual midget would call the the U.S. as "extremist" compared to Iran and NK. " you'd think he could figure that out now that we have to live with a nuclear north korea. " yeah, lets let NK and Iran know we will do NOTHING, that will certainly contain them. When you get back from worshipping Hitlers, Mao's and Stalins grave let us know.
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.